From alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Tue Dec  1 03:45:59 1998
Received: from nurock.kek.jp (root@nurock.kek.jp [130.87.218.140])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA28042
	for <alsa-user@jcu.cz>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 03:43:23 +0100
Received: from nurock.kek.jp (really [127.0.0.1]) by nurock.kek.jp
	via in.smtpd with esmtp (ident sharkey using rfc1413)
	id <m0zkfc5-000TJXC@nurock.kek.jp> (Debian Smail3.2.0.101)
	for <alsa-user@jcu.cz>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 11:32:29 +0900 (JST) 
Message-Id: <m0zkfc5-000TJXC@nurock.kek.jp>
To: alsa-user@jcu.cz
Cc: akos.malone@erols.com
From: sharkey@ale.physics.sunysb.edu
Subject: Re: Why isn't alsa include in kernel source ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Nov 1998 17:19:20 EST."
             <366319E8.523F85FB@erols.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 11:32:24 +0900
Reply-To: alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list

> Nah... from the looks of it sometime during 2.2 right?

I doubt it.

> I mean 2.2 will be out for like a year or longer... :)

And the 2.0 series sound section was last updated when?


A year is not such a long time, when you think about it.

Jaroslav is doing a great job, but there's still much work to be done.
He shouldn't be rushed.

ALSA will go in the kernel when both ALSA and the kernel are ready for each
other.


Eric


