From alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Wed Nov 11 22:19:29 1998
Received: from smtp3.xs4all.nl (smtp3.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.53])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA22869
	for <alsa-user@jcu.cz>; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:19:21 +0100
Received: from cs.vu.nl (orbital.xs4all.nl [194.109.37.98])
	by smtp3.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA02405
	for <alsa-user@jcu.cz>; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:19:18 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <364A0086.13A2A70E@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:24:23 +0100
From: Andy Lo A Foe <arloafoe@cs.vu.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alsa-user@jcu.cz
Subject: Re: about the 0.20-pre10
References: <199811111654.LAA04807@ItMightBeAServer.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list

crc3419@delphi.com wrote:

> Hm...it seems RH4.1 doesn't work as well...is there some way around
> this, or am I just SOL (stinking outta luck)? Or, to put it
> differently, does this mean a complete upgrade of gcc/libc looms near
> in my future? <shudder>

Hmm, I don't know what the chances are of upgrading from RH4.1 to 5.2, but give it a try. Upgrading to glibc 2 is a good thing :)

Andy
--
Andy Lo A Foe, arloafoe@cs.vu.nl |  Linux v2.1.126  | PII 266
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~arloafoe    | GSM: 0622-440695 | Bebox 133
http://orbital.xs4all.nl/andy    |   ICQ: 7472949   | IRCNet: Adnans



