From alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Tue Jan 19 20:00:45 1999
Received: from wacky.total.net (wacky.total.net [205.236.175.121])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08641
	for <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 19:57:32 +0100
Received: from total.net (ppp-5200-2007.mtl.total.net [207.139.113.213])
	by wacky.total.net (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19378
	for <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz>; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:13:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <36A48523.DBBD10A6@total.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:14:14 +0000
From: MiS <mis@total.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz
Subject: Re: Question?  Why Alsa?
References: <007001be4327$e82e8160$91934ac1@w98bg>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list



Benjamin GOLINVAUX wrote:

>
> I think this is a whole debate whether a _high-latency_
> recorder/fx/sequencer is powerful or not...
>
>

I thought that latency was more of a hardware problem ...

MiS


