From alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Mon Jan 18 04:43:42 1999
Received: from giasbm01.vsnl.net.in (giasbm01.vsnl.net.in [202.54.1.18])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA32056
	for <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 04:38:14 +0100
Received: from pentium200 ([202.54.80.100])
	by giasbm01.vsnl.net.in (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA29494
	for <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz>; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:04:49 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <000401be041a$ef8cde80$645036ca@pentium200>
From: "Patanjali" <patanjali@mindless.com>
To: <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz>
Subject: Re: full duplex programming
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:57:45 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-user-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list


-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin GOLINVAUX <golinvaux@benjamin.net>
To: alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz>
Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: full duplex programming


>Hello...
>
>Would you mind sending me your full duplex routine ?
>
>I'm trying to do the same but It is not working as I'd like it to... Maybe
>we could compare our code and share ideas ?
>
>Thanks a lot.
>
>Benjamin GOLINVAUX
>
>
>------

my full duplex routine follows the lines of the alsa-lib/test/latency.c
file.
i m still trying to get the disturbances out of the recording.
another query : is the optimum fragment size also dependent on
the amount of processing that has to be done between record and playback,
if so do we follow the same procedure for getting the frag size ?

- patanjali.


>To unsubscribe from <alsa-user@alsa.jcu.cz> mailing list send message
>'unsubscribe' in the body of message to <alsa-user-request@alsa.jcu.cz>.


