From alsa-devel-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Sat Nov 28 03:46:31 1998
Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [209.152.193.4])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA29264
	for <alsa-devel@jcu.cz>; Sat, 28 Nov 1998 03:46:19 +0100
Received: from someip.ppp.op.net (d-bm3-0d.ppp.op.net [209.152.194.77]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.18 $) with ESMTP id VAA13064 for <alsa-devel@jcu.cz>; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 21:46:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199811280246.VAA13064@renoir.op.net>
To: alsa-devel@jcu.cz
Subject: Re: MINOR numbers - READ PLEASE!!! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Nov 1998 19:13:54 +0100."
             <Pine.LNX.3.96.981126185312.4393E-100000@entry.jcu.cz> 
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 21:44:24 -0500
From: Paul Barton-Davis <pbd@op.net>
Reply-To: alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-devel-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list

>0		1 sequencer
>1-23		reserved
>24-31		8 * 1 control interface
>32-63		8 * 4 mixer devices
>64-95		8 * 4 rawmidi devices
>96-103		8 * 1 raw FM devices

                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So now, Jaroslav, I have to ask: why is OK to have a specific minor
device for raw FM access, but not, as per a previous discussion, for
raw non-FM-synth-access ?

:)

--p

