From alsa-devel-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Fri Oct 16 21:57:52 1998
Received: from entry.jcu.cz (IDENT:perex@entry.jcu.cz [160.217.1.111])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA27970;
	Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:57:47 +0200
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:57:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@jcu.cz>
To: Frank van de Pol <F.K.W.van.de.Pol@inter.nl.net>
cc: alsa-devel@jcu.cz
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] What to do ??? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199810161856.TAA19609@obelix.fvdpol.inter.nl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981016215310.1878E-100000@entry.jcu.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-devel-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list

On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Frank van de Pol wrote:

> > I willn't accept encapsulation of OSS events to ALSA events, too. (Maybe
> > only at kernel level for OSS sequencer emulation - if someone writes it.)
> > This is very bad thing...
> 
> Compatibility has never been a bad thing... Perhaps it's an ugly
> thing...There will be no need to encapsulate the OSS events, as the OSS
> is/will be a subset of the ALSA :-)

Yep, this is very nice goal...

						Jaroslav

-----
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@jcu.cz>
Academic Computer Centre, University of South Bohemia
Branisovska 31, C. Budejovice, CZ-370 05 Czech Republic


