From alsa-devel-owner@alsa.jcu.cz  Tue Mar  9 19:00:01 1999
Received: from druid.inprise.com (druid.inprise.com [143.186.11.70])
	by marvin.jcu.cz (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA23690
	for <alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 18:59:34 +0100
Received: from godzilla.inprise.com (mail.inprise.com [10.186.1.4])
	by druid.inprise.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA26041
	for <alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduffey ([10.143.1.75]) by godzilla.inprise.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)  with SMTP id AAA344E
          for <alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:55:02 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990309095540.009761e0@mail.inprise.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 09:55:40 -0800
To: alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz
From: "Kevin Duffey" <kduffey@inprise.com>
Subject: Re: New call.html
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: alsa-devel@alsa.jcu.cz
Sender: alsa-devel-owner@alsa.jcu.cz
Precedence: list

>Wouldn't postscript be the best format for printable documentation?  It
>doesn't require any binary-only programs to view or print (Acrobat
>reader), and is the full version of what pdf was bastardized from.
>Besides, for those with postscript printers, you can just print the file
>straight, no interpetive programs needed. :-)

But..dont you need Postscript drivers? Why not just HTML? Seems most
everybody has a web browser these days. Are you talking about the
downloadable document, or the one displayed on the web site? Obviously the
one on the web site is HTML, but HTML is easy enough to use any web browser
to view it, and you can "decent" formatting with it.



Kevin Duffey
kduffey@inprise.com

